Wednesday, November 24, 2010

No! I won't carry you. But will take a bullet for you!

Recently, I had the privilege to visit France as part of a group social entrepreneurs, aspiring social entrepreneurs and students studying social entrepreneurship at INSEAD - yes, it is indeed the trendy new bandwagon in development. (Even Hillary Clinton endorsed it In Speech and In Deed recently). It was an interesting and supportive experience to share our thoughts with many like-minded people and professionals so far from home. 

I returned with a head full of thoughts about our work to date and our strategic direction for the future - and the thoughtful support of trustworthy people with our best interest at heart. It was an empowering and foreign experience (to be really honest) - this receiving side of entrepreneurial support. One of Uthango's key programmes in the past - recognised by the Impumelelo Innovations Awards Trust (some pictures via link)- is called 'Poverty Alleviation through Social Enterprise Support in Communities' and it focuses on providing training, personal development (coaching) and business mentoring services to micro-entrepreneurs with the potential to make a difference. "All of a sudden" (as a friend would say) I found myself on the other side of the spectrum in a reversal of roles and I had to trust a process that we did not design nor had much influence over at the time.  

In the programme, each social entrepreneur was 'allocated' a 'mentor/coach'. This (in itself) was an interesting 'first' as social entrepreneurs and non-profit leaders traditionally travel the road of their cause or (com)passion fairly alone - at least in my experience and view. It is not the popular option to be an entrepreneur in a developing country, such as South Africa, where there is a high premium and status attached to being employed in the formal sector. Compensation is low and working environment tough.

For me, it felt like gaining an instant friend for our business that I just had to get to know better. Someone to carry a bit of me - not all of me! I explored with the dynamics of the relationship and trusted  her with business 'inside information' and my expectations were exceeded. 

Granted, I find the existing definitions and clarifications of mentoring versus coaching stale and uninspiring and we had to carve our own way forward. How do you describe someone who is trusted as a close friend, with much-needed expert professional knowledge about another industry, and an analytical, critical open-mind to defy all definitions and design a relationship devoid of power politics and personal agenda? I had to resist the urge to climb onto the back of this newly 'assigned mentor' and sigh with a relief: "Carry me, Carry me". After all - THIS would not be the ideal scenario: Apart from me breaking the back of the new trustee with my local burdens of our work, it would slow me down; it would slow all of us down. 

So, the gurus write about the difference between a mentor and coach and it appears that a coach is chosen to lead someone to greater personal and/or professional heights with an emphasis on the person, whereas a mentor are more directive, asking the right questions at the right time. with much focus on goals to achieve. There is another interesting piece about the different roles on the Six Figures blog written by Kelly Magowen  with her 14 years experience in career coaching. (And coaching is NOT therapy, even though it could lead to it or evolve into it - a responsibility that a coach who is not a trained therapist should defer). By now, I have read several articles and academic write-ups about coaching, advising, consultation and mentoring; and I have decided that in practice - from the social entrepreneur side - there are two elements  of the relationship that matters much more than all the definitions combined: boundaries and expectations

I would argue (in my short experience within this programme of support to social entrepreneurs in Africa) that we need neither a coach nor an adviser, and also not a mentor or industry 'expert'  as much as we could do with a trusted friend willing to share from her/his network and from her life experience and knowledge as an equal on a path of learning. Setting boundaries jointly and levelling expectations are part of building a stable working relationship. Let's put it this way as well: Social entrepreneurs need someone that believes so much in us that she would 'take a bullet' and is willing to stick her neck out for our business.  I also prefer the term 'consigliere' in this sense - not part of the family, but close enough to be family to be mistaken as part of it - always retaining loyal ties with the members. Our faithful counsellor respects our autonomy and would even communicate the vision of the business, but is not afraid to voice her own opinion fearlessly: 
The role of a consigliere is a remnant of medieval times when nobles of a conquered court would make themselves available to the new monarch.
Asking too much? Yes, maybe - but why not? Our social businesses ARE different; and it does ask for more risk - more reputational risk, on our side and on the sides of those aligned to us.  Some argue the risk is less, because it is a social enterprise, and less money is involved. Nonsense. Much is at stake. Therefore, make the choice carefully, but when you do become involved with a social enterprise, expect the journey to be exhilarating and rewarding.

It is an exciting time for us and there are so many people that are turning to us to ask how they can assist us to scale our initiatives. We are realigning and in this process, we are choosing the friends of our business, and they are choosing us... I am encouraged - not by definitions or programmes or activities of support, but by the expressed good intent of people and the selfless demonstration of their belief in the approach we follow to development and the sincere desire we share to have social impact way beyond ourselves.


Kwame Oh November 24, 2010 at 8:29 PM  

Interesting what I would call finding gravity within this new space, where the word collaboration is banded around like as if now the norm, but alas truth be told not so.

When you got to "trusted friend willing to share from her/his network and from her/his life experience and knowledge as an equal on a path of learning." as an alternative, for one moment I thought you were about to make the leap made by myself a while ago.

My belief is that in "olden times" words like couch and mentor did fit within the context of communication tools of the era but in today's space we find ourselves would replace not with friend as individual as you muse upon in above, but would say collective of minds is the way forward so OK will go with friends plural though if collaboration should reach its ultimate evolution this would include friends of friends, and if this language seems familiar its because the tools already exist, its our reluctance to "indulge me here" to trust the force.

To end all such names and titles from our past will have to be revisited even if to avoid the confusion we all find in the dialogue in today's space, and I thank you for raising the topic.

metaMeerkat™ November 24, 2010 at 10:07 PM  

Thanks for taking the time to comment, Julius. Part of the write-up is exactly this: that we get so hung up with definitions that that essence of what we actually DO in a relationship of peers, or for business, gets lost...

I agree that 'collective of minds' may also fit the bill, but prefer the term friend - and not in the shallow social networky 'friend', but one that truly CONNECTS and become part of the conscious mind - shaping our thinking and way of living - the very choices we make. Indeed, the same as your 'collective' but one at a time, one relationship of depth and meaning at a time.

Follow my Blog

News from our Company

Tell Others about This Blog

Bookmark and Share

  © Blogger template 'Neuronic' by 2008

Back to TOP